Anyone know of a good/quick (and free) way to compress HTML code?

"DAVID" <david@nospam.nspam> wrote in message
news:ubh%23xa1lHHA.3760@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> > I thought the limit for a memo field was nearer 65K?
>
> No, the limit for a Textbox CONTROL is 64K OR 32K. The limit
> for a memo FIELD is 1GB or 2GB.

So if you are using straight Access (no DAO etc) then you are in effect
limited to a textbox which would explain where the 64K limit comes from.
Hence the limit on a memo field unless you use DAO etc which bypasses using
a textbox.

Nice to understand where the limitations come from. Thanks.
--
Brian Cryer
www.cryer.co.uk/brian

I'm not sure about the exact numbers. Also, I don't know when you have to
use GetChunk to get the data, and when you can just use the field value. A
search here would probably find better information.

(david)

"Brian Cryer" <brian.cryer@127.0.0.1.ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:XLydnTvEGKNUXtfbnZ2dnUVZ8qCqnZ2d@pipex.net...
> "DAVID" <david@nospam.nspam> wrote in message
> news:ubh%23xa1lHHA.3760@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> > I thought the limit for a memo field was nearer 65K?
>>
>> No, the limit for a Textbox CONTROL is 64K OR 32K. The limit
>> for a memo FIELD is 1GB or 2GB.
>
> So if you are using straight Access (no DAO etc) then you are in effect
> limited to a textbox which would explain where the 64K limit comes from.
> Hence the limit on a memo field unless you use DAO etc which bypasses
> using a textbox.
>
> Nice to understand where the limitations come from. Thanks.
> --
> Brian Cryer
> www.cryer.co.uk/brian
>
>