Computer Webmaster Gaming Console Graphics Forum

Welcome to the Computer Webmaster Gaming Console Graphics Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

MK PitStop Main Earn $25 Earn Money Posting Extras Members Blogs Image Hosting User Pages
Go Back   Computer Webmaster Gaming Console Graphics Forum > Webmaster Forum > Website Coding > HTML
Register FAQ/Rules Become A V.I.P. Member Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

HTML HTML problems, maybe you are trying to code for MySpace. Get all the HTML coding help here for your website.

Google
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2007, 2:02 PM   #1
IhateSPAM
 
IhateSPAM's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
My Photos: (0)

Banked:
MK Cash: $

I am Worth:
MK Cash: $
Donate

Recent Blog: None

Default upgrade to html 4.1 strict

Hello,

In older html versions there was a target attributte to A links. How can I
do it now in html 4.1 strict? It's because the W3C validator gives error in
the target attreibute.


Thanking in advance,
Nuno Lopes


 
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Old 07-01-2007, 2:02 PM   #2
Andy Dingley
 
Andy Dingley's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
My Photos: (0)

Banked:
MK Cash: $

I am Worth:
MK Cash: $
Donate

Recent Blog: None

Default upgrade to html 4.1 strict

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 17:58:58 +0100, "IhateSPAM" <sorry@IhateSPAM.org>
wrote:

>In older html versions there was a target attributte to A links. How can I
>do it now in html 4.1 strict?


You can't. Nor is switching to HTML 4.01 Strict an "upgrade". If you
wish to use target (and there's no reason you shouldn't) then use
Transitional instead. It's what it's there for. Strict is in no way
"better".


Target is useful, as a concept, but the implementation was inadequate.
Strict ditched it, in favour of a modularised approach and some better
and more capable replacement for it. Owing to the vagaries of
development scheduling, such a replacement didn't really happen until
modularised XHTML and XLink (which still has negligible browser
support).

 
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Featured Websites
Free Space
Free Space
Free Space Free Space
Closed Thread
Tags: , ,




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
thanks for your help on html vs CSS naitsirch79 HTML 3 07-01-2007 2:02 PM
DAB Upgrade Graeme Cosgrove Car audio 0 06-18-2007 12:03 PM
sorry for HTML Guy Melan Car audio 0 06-17-2007 3:02 PM
upgrade Dave Motherboards 0 06-11-2007 1:07 PM
HTML help Stivey HTML 8 03-27-2006 3:30 AM


Featured Websites




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 5:57 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
Cheap Computers
MK PitStop Copyright 2005 - 2008

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98