![]() |
|
Welcome to the Computer Webmaster Gaming Console Graphics Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| HTML HTML problems, maybe you are trying to code for MySpace. Get all the HTML coding help here for your website. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 | ||
| Hi, Just a seemingly small question : is there an acceptable cut off point on how far a website is degradable to? As it stands, yet another site I'm working on degrades as far down as to CSS support. If you don't have CSS, the site will still work, but looks awful. The JS and Java bits degrade to their plain states. Is there a "safe" level to assume the majority of browsers will be able to cope with using their pre-installed values or even if they have been played with? TTFN Paul | |||
|
| Advertisements |
| | #2 | ||
| "Paul F. Johnson" <paulf.johnson@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news > Hi, > > Just a seemingly small question : is there an acceptable cut off point on > how far a website is degradable to? > > As it stands, yet another site I'm working on degrades as far down as to > CSS support. If you don't have CSS, the site will still work, but looks > awful. The JS and Java bits degrade to their plain states. > > Is there a "safe" level to assume the majority of browsers will be able to > cope with using their pre-installed values or even if they have been > played with? Download a copy of Lynx (text only browser). It gives you an idea of what a blind person will hear and what a search engine spider will see. Cheers Richard. | |||
|
| | #3 | ||
| "Paul F. Johnson" <paulf.johnson@ukonline.co.uk> wrote: >As it stands, yet another site I'm working on degrades as far down as to >CSS support. If you don't have CSS, the site will still work, but looks >awful. Define "awful", a site sans CSS should look very clear, information/content only. Presentation is by definition 100% optional, if the content isn't 100% clear without it then you have used CSS inappropriately (hard to do), or more likely your markup is incorrect. Headless | |||
|
| | #4 | ||
| "Paul F. Johnson" <paulf.johnson@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news > Is there a "safe" level to assume the majority of browsers will be able to > cope with using their pre-installed values or even if they have been > played with? One really good place to visit is this site http://www.csszengarden.com/ When you remove all CSS/images etc... it becomes just plain text as in a document. It doesnt look like it was before but it isnt excatly awful, just plain. I reckon this is what all sites should be able to degrade to, like a text document but thats just me. Andy | |||
|
| Featured Websites | ||||
|
![]() |
| Tags: degradation, level, safe, website |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| KINDA SPOILER ALERT - Missing Level (Not MP Level) - Please readafter playing game. | Phyber Quest | Console Subjects | 2 | 06-26-2007 12:57 PM |
| Halo: best level & worst level | Keith | Console Subjects | 1 | 06-26-2007 12:46 PM |
| Halo: best level & worst level | Sty | Console Subjects | 23 | 06-26-2007 12:29 PM |
| Do you need a safe have for your money? | Trustfunds Limited | Building An Internet Business | 0 | 05-29-2007 12:43 AM |
| Featured Websites | ||||
|