Anyone found a good web authoring or newsletter package for executive use?

In article <4gdbfv08jar2ei6hto4n55hsedh0r9l3dd@4ax.com>,
invalid_address@dna.ie says...
> HTML has absolutely nothing to do with "programming".

I think this forum is way to anal about the word programming.

--
Whitecrest Entertainment
www.whitecrestent.com

Whitecrest <whitecrest@zipzap.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.195fd823b7aa9f819896d4@news.charter.net> ...
> In article <4gdbfv08jar2ei6hto4n55hsedh0r9l3dd@4ax.com>,
> invalid_address@dna.ie says...
> > HTML has absolutely nothing to do with "programming".
>
> I think this forum is way to anal about the word programming.

We are, on the other hand, quite forgiving about the misuse of "to",
"too", and "two". And, also on the softer side, it's been quite some
time since a top-poster was serious maimed here.

---- jerry (http://jersblog.com)

"Jerry Muelver" <jerry@allmyfaqs.com> wrote in message
news:c1bf2c9b.0306231640.a9a9f93@posting.google.co m...
| Whitecrest <whitecrest@zipzap.com> wrote in message
news:<MPG.195fd823b7aa9f819896d4@news.charter.net> ...
| > In article <4gdbfv08jar2ei6hto4n55hsedh0r9l3dd@4ax.com>,
| > invalid_address@dna.ie says...
| > > HTML has absolutely nothing to do with "programming".
| >
| > I think this forum is way to anal about the word programming.
|
| We are, on the other hand, quite forgiving about the misuse of "to",
| "too", and "two". And, also on the softer side, it's been quite some
| time since a top-poster was serious maimed here.
|
| ---- jerry (http://jersblog.com)

Top posting is very common in most newsgroups that I use . . it suits
those of us that use Outlook Express where it saves a lot of scrolling.
Sorry if it offends you.

Jim

Jim Kelly wrote:
>
> Top posting is very common in most newsgroups that I use . . it suits
> those of us that use Outlook Express

http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/

--

Mark Parnell
http://www.clarkecomputers.com.au

"Jim Kelly" <kellwood@compuREMOVE_TO_EMAIL_MEserve.com> wrote in message news:<3ef7ab06$0$26639$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com. au>...
> "Jerry Muelver" <jerry@allmyfaqs.com> wrote in message
> news:c1bf2c9b.0306231640.a9a9f93@posting.google.co m...
> | Whitecrest <whitecrest@zipzap.com> wrote in message
> news:<MPG.195fd823b7aa9f819896d4@news.charter.net> ...
> | > In article <4gdbfv08jar2ei6hto4n55hsedh0r9l3dd@4ax.com>,
> | > invalid_address@dna.ie says...
> | > > HTML has absolutely nothing to do with "programming".
> | >
> | > I think this forum is way to anal about the word programming.
> |
> | We are, on the other hand, quite forgiving about the misuse of "to",
> | "too", and "two". And, also on the softer side, it's been quite some
> | time since a top-poster was serious maimed here.
> |
> | ---- jerry (http://jersblog.com)
>
> Top posting is very common in most newsgroups that I use . . it suits
> those of us that use Outlook Express where it saves a lot of scrolling.
> Sorry if it offends you.
>
> Jim

I didn't say it offends me. I was only pointing out that pickyness is
sometimes suspended, if only momentarily, when the content merits a
willing suspension of presentation expectations. After all, I'm a
"content rules" kind of guy. But the best content in the world won't
do the job if it doesn't get delivered, and if the presentation
impedes delivery.... Well, there ya go!

It would be silly of me to go to a group that has adopted a
top-posting "norm" and rant on the benefits of bottom-posting. But
it's not at all silly to hold forth on an HTML-centered group on the
benefits of minimalist formatting for Web pages. Clean and simple
delivers the content, gets the message across, and gains the desired
response -- all critical elements to serious content-based
communication. Entertainment-based communication is a different
animal, and not likely the proper domain for production-amateur
collaboration... unless, of course, it's on a wiki.

---- jerry (http://jersblog.com)

"Jerry Muelver" <jerry@allmyfaqs.com> wrote in message
news:c1bf2c9b.0306240228.525b1784@posting.google.c om...
| "Jim Kelly" <kellwood@compuREMOVE_TO_EMAIL_MEserve.com> wrote in
message news:<3ef7ab06$0$26639$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com. au>...
| > "Jerry Muelver" <jerry@allmyfaqs.com> wrote in message
| > news:c1bf2c9b.0306231640.a9a9f93@posting.google.co m...
| > | Whitecrest <whitecrest@zipzap.com> wrote in message
| > news:<MPG.195fd823b7aa9f819896d4@news.charter.net> ...
| > | > In article <4gdbfv08jar2ei6hto4n55hsedh0r9l3dd@4ax.com>,
| > | > invalid_address@dna.ie says...
| > | > > HTML has absolutely nothing to do with "programming".
| > | >
| > | > I think this forum is way to anal about the word programming.
| > |
| > | We are, on the other hand, quite forgiving about the misuse of
"to",
| > | "too", and "two". And, also on the softer side, it's been quite
some
| > | time since a top-poster was serious maimed here.
| > |
| > | ---- jerry (http://jersblog.com)
| >
| > Top posting is very common in most newsgroups that I use . . it
suits
| > those of us that use Outlook Express where it saves a lot of
scrolling.
| > Sorry if it offends you.
| >
| > Jim
|
| I didn't say it offends me. I was only pointing out that pickyness is
| sometimes suspended, if only momentarily, when the content merits a
| willing suspension of presentation expectations. After all, I'm a
| "content rules" kind of guy. But the best content in the world won't
| do the job if it doesn't get delivered, and if the presentation
| impedes delivery.... Well, there ya go!
|
| It would be silly of me to go to a group that has adopted a
| top-posting "norm" and rant on the benefits of bottom-posting. But
| it's not at all silly to hold forth on an HTML-centered group on the
| benefits of minimalist formatting for Web pages. Clean and simple
| delivers the content, gets the message across, and gains the desired
| response -- all critical elements to serious content-based
| communication. Entertainment-based communication is a different
| animal, and not likely the proper domain for production-amateur
| collaboration... unless, of course, it's on a wiki.
|
| ---- jerry (http://jersblog.com)

There . . . I did it! Wicked! Bottom posted.

Jerry, I bet you'd love the phrase:

### Perception IS Reality!! ###

Apologies to whoever coined it, but I'm sure that it's true!

"Jim Kelly" <kellwood@compuREMOVE_TO_EMAIL_MEserve.com> wrote in message news:<3ef82d0c$0$26636$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com. au>...

> There . . . I did it! Wicked! Bottom posted.
>

Next step -- delete all the non-relevant text, the stuff that
top-posters allow to accumulate at the bottom of their messages, so
you have a punchy, direct-to-the-jugular message.

> Jerry, I bet you'd love the phrase:
>
> ### Perception IS Reality!! ###
>
> Apologies to whoever coined it, but I'm sure that it's true!

If I didn't coin it, I should have!

---- jerry (http://jersblog.com)

Jim Kelly wrote:

> Top posting is very common in most newsgroups that I use . . it suits
> those of us that use Outlook Express where it saves a lot of scrolling.

At the expense of bandwidth and the loss of context. Using a foghorn is a
good way of catching the waiter's attention at a restaurant - being seen as
complete jackass by everyone else there is an added bonus.

If you have to scroll to read this, then its an indication your set-up is at
fault.


--
Iso.
FAQs: http://html-faq.com http://alt-html.org http://allmyfaqs.com/
Recommended Hosting: http://www.affordablehost.com/
Web Standards: http://www.webstandards.org/

>>
"Jerry Muelver" <jerry@allmyfaqs.com> wrote in message
news:c1bf2c9b.0306240608.2d7ac56b@posting.google.c om...
Next step -- delete all the non-relevant text
<<

Now it makes sense! I think you will find that top posters hate to
tamper with the text that they are responding to. It feels like fraud!
Those of you who hate top posting will do well to ease us into the
(lovely 8-)) ability to snip!

This is the best of both worlds!

Thanks Jerry,

(I've been waiting to see some of your devotees chip in and say
wonderful things about WikiWriter . . . is it really a great tool for my
purposes?).

Cheers,

Jim Kelly

Jim Kelly wrote:
> "Jerry Muelver" <jerry@allmyfaqs.com> wrote in message
> news:c1bf2c9b.0306240608.2d7ac56b@posting.google.c om...
> Next step -- delete all the non-relevant text
> <<
>
> Now it makes sense! I think you will find that top posters hate to
> tamper with the text that they are responding to. It feels like fraud!
> Those of you who hate top posting will do well to ease us into the
> (lovely 8-)) ability to snip!
>
> This is the best of both worlds!
>
> Thanks Jerry,
>
> (I've been waiting to see some of your devotees chip in and say
> wonderful things about WikiWriter . . . is it really a great tool for my
> purposes?).

Sorry we can't come to the phone right now, our monthly
PraiseBeJerryTheMuelver worship is in session. Please call back later.
Thank you. Hallelujahgobble!


Matthias