![]() |
|
Welcome to the Computer Webmaster Gaming Console Graphics Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Database Database problems or need to ask a question? maybe something to do with sql injections or a database software question. Database topics cover MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server or anything else related to databases. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 | ||
| Is there any benefit in doing: SELECT a.f1, a.f2, b.f3 FROM t1 a INNER JOIN t2 b ON a.f1=b.id WHERE a.f1> 0 rather than SELECT a.f1, a.f2, b.f3 FROM t1 a , t2 b WHERE a.f1> 0 and a.f1 = b.id TIA Paul | |||
|
| Advertisements |
| | #2 | ||
| Paul, > Is there any benefit in doing: > > SELECT a.f1, a.f2, b.f3 FROM t1 a INNER JOIN t2 b ON a.f1=b.id WHERE a.f1> 0 > > rather than > > SELECT a.f1, a.f2, b.f3 FROM t1 a , t2 b WHERE a.f1> 0 and a.f1 = b.id IMO, the "join" syntax is the preffered syntax. 1 - it's "newer" (SQL92 as opposed to SQL89) 2 - it's easier to read (especially when joining multiple tables) 3 - it's more clear (you're "joining" to show that you're getting data from multiple tables in the FROM clause of your statement, makes perfect sense) 4 - you can easily modify the join options (eg: LEFT JOIN) without having to re-write the query 5 - think of "where" as restrictions on the output rather then a place of joining tables -- Martijn Tonies Database Workbench - development tool for MySQL, and more! Upscene Productions http://www.upscene.com My thoughts: http://blog.upscene.com/martijn/ Database development questions? Check the forum! http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com | |||
|
| | #3 | ||
| Martijn Tonies wrote: > Paul, > >> Is there any benefit in doing: >> >> SELECT a.f1, a.f2, b.f3 FROM t1 a INNER JOIN t2 b ON a.f1=b.id WHERE a.f1> > 0 >> rather than >> >> SELECT a.f1, a.f2, b.f3 FROM t1 a , t2 b WHERE a.f1> 0 and a.f1 = b.id > > IMO, the "join" syntax is the preffered syntax. > > 1 - it's "newer" (SQL92 as opposed to SQL89) > 2 - it's easier to read (especially when joining multiple tables) > 3 - it's more clear (you're "joining" to show that you're getting data from > multiple tables in the FROM clause of your statement, makes perfect sense) > 4 - you can easily modify the join options (eg: LEFT JOIN) without having > to re-write the query > 5 - think of "where" as restrictions on the output rather then a place of > joining tables 6 - You do not suffer from any precedence changes between JOIN and ',' Greetings Kai -- This signature is left as an exercise for the reader. | |||
|
| Featured Websites | ||||
|
![]() |
| Tags: join |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is self-join appropriate? | Michal Stankoviansky | Database | 6 | 07-01-2007 6:38 PM |
| Hi join in the fun with nbc | N&D1954 | Affiliate Programs | 0 | 06-12-2007 7:54 PM |
| WE PAY FOR YOU TO JOIN ! ! | Georgie | Building An Internet Business | 0 | 05-29-2007 1:40 AM |
| WE PAY FOR YOU TO JOIN ! ! | Georgie | Building An Internet Business | 0 | 05-29-2007 1:40 AM |
| WE PAY FOR YOU TO JOIN ! ! | UCE | Building An Internet Business | 0 | 05-29-2007 1:38 AM |
| Featured Websites | ||||
|