![]() |
|
Welcome to the Computer Webmaster Gaming Console Graphics Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Website Advertising Or Marketing Advertising or marketing help needed, ask your questions here.
No Selling Here Please Use The Market Section! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 | ||
| I've done a pretty good job of bringing traffic to my site and got about 1200 visitors this month to a particular page. The page is at new URL which can only be reached if somebody clicks on one of my ads. - 82% of the people who visit this page don't click through to another page. - 83% spend 30s or less, and another 10% spend between 30 & 60s. - I get three or four inquiries a week, which is about 1% of the people who visit that page. Bottom line is that I'm only getting three or four calls a week. I think that my ads are fairly well targeted and I want to improve the response rate from the page. Or, I don't know, maybe 1% is good and maybe I should focus on my advertising campeign instead. The page I'm speaking of is at http://miketurco.com/power2.html . I've started making some modifications to this page at http://miketurco.com/power3.html but thought that I'd ask for your feedback before going too far with the changes. Thanks! Mike | |||
| Advertisements |
| | #2 | ||
| "Mike Turco" <miketurco@yahoo-nospam4me.com> wrote in message news:cqv9h70h80@enews3.newsguy.com... > > I've done a pretty good job of bringing traffic to my site and got about > 1200 visitors this month to a particular page. The page is at new URL > which > can only be reached if somebody clicks on one of my ads. > > - 82% of the people who visit this page don't click through to another > page. > > - 83% spend 30s or less, and another 10% spend between 30 & 60s. > > - I get three or four inquiries a week, which is about 1% of the people > who > visit that page. > > Bottom line is that I'm only getting three or four calls a week. I think > that my ads are fairly well targeted and I want to improve the response > rate > from the page. > > Or, I don't know, maybe 1% is good and maybe I should focus on my > advertising > campeign instead. > > The page I'm speaking of is at http://miketurco.com/power2.html . I've > started making some modifications to this page at > http://miketurco.com/power3.html but thought that I'd ask for your > feedback > before going too far with the changes. > > Thanks! > > Mike > Mike, The first issue that occurs to me is the relationship between the ads you are placing and the kind of business you are looking to get (i.e., the descriptions on the page the ad leads to). From reading the page provided, my first impression was - Microsoft Office programmer (macro language + VBA + product knowledge). Second, database and/or spreadsheet programming (still Microsoft Office programmer). Third, Microsoft Office programmer (clearly stated down the page). While that means a good deal to someone who has worked with the Office Suite and coding either macros or VBA, I'm not sure what is communicated to general business visitors, hence the question about correlation between ad and target page. IMHO, when you try to address two (very) different audiences on the same page, you tend to lose both of them. I would think about ads directed at developers needing QA & other help, directed to a page specialized for them, and separate ads pointing to a separate page for the small - to - medium businesses I expect you have been servicing. I would ask what the businesses who have come to you in the past thought they were looking for, as opposed to what you wound up recommending that you do for them. Then I would try to get the business page to reflect those sorts of needs. For example: (Need to convert a business application to work on the web? Need to integrate your contact management information / software with your applications? We specialize in getting more from your investment in Microsoft Office products. From spreadsheets to databases, we can integrate your existing applications and data and take them in the direction you want. ) Then provide a list of examples (sort of what you have on the left side of the page now), and be as generic as possible. These examples could link to a separate page for each type of work, and include a description of what sorts of things can be done, and a business success story. Each of these pages, as well as the initial page, all include a link to a contact page, and a "doing business with us" page, that includes the sort of things you have at the bottom of the page, perhaps a sample contract, and (repeated) contact information. My preference, as you can see from the foregoing, is for short, simple pages with a clear message to a single audience. This leads to a breadcrumb trail for the birds (visitors) to follow. If someone sees a problem that sounds sort of what they are encountering, they can go to a detailed page to see. If the description is similar to what they are facing, they can see that someone else had a similar problem, and how you fixed it. Then they can see how you do business on the next page, and if they have a "warm fuzzy" feeling about you, they will get in touch. If you decide to keep pretty much what you have anyway, I have two small suggestions. 1. Rename the material in the left column to something like "How we have helped other businesses" and 2. Reduce the appeal to developers to a question like "Developers - looking for QA & other help?" with a link to a separate page for the sorts of services you offer to that other audience. Best of luck with your businesses in the coming year. George King g.e. king Marketing | |||
| | #3 | ||
| "George King" <news@geking.com> wrote in message news:cqve420ois@enews3.newsguy.com... > > > "Mike Turco" <miketurco@yahoo-nospam4me.com> wrote in message > news:cqv9h70h80@enews3.newsguy.com... >> >> I've done a pretty good job of bringing traffic to my site and got about >> 1200 visitors this month to a particular page. The page is at new URL >> which >> can only be reached if somebody clicks on one of my ads. <snip> >> Bottom line is that I'm only getting three or four calls a week. > Mike, > > The first issue that occurs to me is the relationship between the ads you > are placing and the kind of business you are looking to get (i.e., the > descriptions on the page the ad leads to). From reading the page > provided, > my first impression was - Microsoft Office programmer (macro language + > VBA > + product knowledge). Second, database and/or spreadsheet programming > (still Microsoft Office programmer). Third, Microsoft Office programmer > (clearly stated down the page). While that means a good deal to someone > who > has worked with the Office Suite and coding either macros or VBA, I'm not > sure what is communicated to general business visitors, hence the question > about correlation between ad and target page. Hi George, I am trying to build a new segment for my business, which is helping people who fit into one of two categories. They are working on a project and they need help with it, or they have something that has already been done and they just need to add some functionality. So far these small jobs are more profitable, and this move also puts me into a tighter niche that is easier to define. Most of the people who call are looking to have that kind of work done, although I've had a few call to inquire into bigger projects. I'm not opposed to bigger projects, but I hope that these smaller projects will eventually take over. > IMHO, when you try to address two (very) different audiences on the same > page, you tend to lose both of them. I would think about ads directed at > developers needing QA & other help, directed to a page specialized for > them, > and separate ads pointing to a separate page for the small - to - medium > businesses I expect you have been servicing. I was trying to be business friendly. My ideal client is a business person who has, say, a spreadsheet they've developed and they need to add some macros, or they need somebody to write formulas for them. So far I've gotten a mix of jobs as far as complexity is concerned. The more complex the project the more I charge to do the job, but the less I make overall. The ideal job is a quick subroutine that I can bang out, test and ship for my minimum rate. > I would ask what the businesses who have come to you in the past thought > they were looking for, as opposed to what you wound up recommending that > you > do for them. This is a new thing for me. I've grown tired of mega projects. I built a big machine once that hooked to a computer. It took me two years to build the damn thing and build the interface. I still have bad dreams about that. These little jobs are kind of like riddles. You think them through, solve the riddle and move on. > Then I would try to get the business page to reflect those > sorts of needs. For example: (Need to convert a business application to > work on the web? Need to integrate your contact management information / > software with your applications? We specialize in getting more from your > investment in Microsoft Office products. From spreadsheets to databases, > we can integrate your existing applications and data and take them in the > direction you want. ) Then provide a list of examples (sort of what you > have on the left side of the page now), and be as generic as possible. Which brings me to another point. I've been thinking about dumping that home page all together except as it relates to selling these little jobs. Of course, this concept of mine needs to prove itself out first. I should probably get another domain name going that really narrows things down to this one specific thing. > These examples could link to a separate page for each type of work, and > include a description of what sorts of things can be done, and a business > success story. Each of these pages, as well as the initial page, all > include a link to a contact page, and a "doing business with us" page, > that > includes the sort of things you have at the bottom of the page, perhaps a > sample contract, and (repeated) contact information. I've been thinking about putting together a little contract. For the most part I worry about writing a tight spec for what is delivered up front. My customers tend to be somewhat technical and we can come to a pretty good agreement about what is to be done. "You want this and this, and when I've delivered exactly those two things you pay me $X." > My preference, as you can see from the foregoing, is for short, simple > pages > with a clear message to a single audience. You're right. I need to narrow things down. I have that good intention but I'm waffling because this business model hasn't proven itself. Registering another domain may really be the key. Then I don't have to worry about giving up my day job, so to speak. > This leads to a breadcrumb trail > for the birds (visitors) to follow. If someone sees a problem that sounds > sort of what they are encountering, they can go to a detailed page to see. > If the description is similar to what they are facing, they can see that > someone else had a similar problem, and how you fixed it. Then they can > see > how you do business on the next page, and if they have a "warm fuzzy" > feeling about you, they will get in touch. > > If you decide to keep pretty much what you have anyway, I have two small > suggestions. 1. Rename the material in the left column to something like > "How we have helped other businesses" and 2. Reduce the appeal to > developers to a question like "Developers - looking for QA & other help?" > with a link to a separate page for the sorts of services you offer to that > other audience. Thanks for all the great advice. I'll definitely take you up on it. > Best of luck with your businesses in the coming year. Thanks! The same to you. Mike | |||
| | #4 | ||
| > > Bottom line is that I'm only getting three or four calls a week. I think > that my ads are fairly well targeted and I want to improve the response rate > from the page. > > Or, I don't know, maybe 1% is good and maybe I should focus on my advertising > campeign instead. > Hi, I remember looking at your site before and sending you some suggestions. I agree with the post that said you should have separate pages for each of your services and direct people to specific pages depending on what your ad is for so they can get specific information on what you offer, that fits their needs. Also, you need to have a contact form on every page. I don't see where you sell a specific product for a specific price, so you need them to fill out a form, with all their contact info, and space for them to tell you whet their need is. I believe people prefer to send in their information thru a form, not pick up a phone and call. Often people are surfing the net (even for work) after business hours, and the form is easier for them. I would also suggest you offer them something in exchange for filling out the contact form. It looks like in your business a "free" phone consultation would work well. People looking to use your services are probably looking for advise on how to proceed. A 15 minute consultation would either send them off in the right direction or give you an opportunity to write up a proposal. If you can't do "free", offer a $29 consultation, and if you end up doing work for them, apply that as a $29 discount. I bet many people would pay $29 to get an down to earth answer to their question. Good luck, Dave | |||
| | #5 | ||
| "Mike Turco" <miketurco@yahoo-nospam4me.com> wrote in message news:cqv9h70h80@enews3.newsguy.com... > > I've done a pretty good job of bringing traffic to my site and got about --snip-- I think a 1% return is most impressive, I'd say excellent! When the best direct mail campaign ever produced by the best in the business only expect a 2% return. So your cost per 'hit' is fabulous. As George King mentioned, you may want to fine tune your messages to specific markets. For example, when talking to a small business/person they know their business and their market but don't have a clue as to the power of the Internet and Office bundled software other than for writing an invoice or a letter. Most don't know that once a piece of information is put into their system, that piece of information can be automatically inserted anywhere it's needed without keystrokes. Few know how easy it would be to put a wedge to scan data and to use bar-coding cheat sheets, or how to have their system automatically open Internet, do their market research, fish for new prospects all of this while they are asleep. In other words, they will be earning money while sleeping. How many small businesses do you know that have their email signature option set to automatically generate a boilerplate response, then put that address in a database for future mailings and follow-ups? What percentage of businesses that you visit use the computer only for printing out a bill and don't even bother to scan incoming shipments via barcode, nor use these features to their fullest? How many know that when you hit reply to an email in Outlook Express it automatically saves that address in their phone book directory? And if they do know, how many know how to use that database profitably? My suggestion is to put some focus on small businesses that already have a basic system and then you can walk them through bit by bit, as is your expressed preference, until they gain mastery. Each customer will become a long time client as you give them a weekly treat that with one click saves them a minute. A minute saved every half hour of the day adds up. I'm sure you can demonstrate through an easy presentation just how a mom and pop garage can become fully automated by starting with just the basic package and that over time they will learn to use the full features as you develop them and install them for one click operation. "One click will save you a minute... every time, every day." Wayne | |||
| | #6 | ||
| Hi Dave, > > Hi, > I remember looking at your site before and sending you some suggestions. Some good ones, in fact. I took advantage of some and others are still on "the list". One thing you suggested was offering a specific service for a certain amount of money, which (I suppose) could be something in and of itself, or a lead-in to a bigger service. I'm hesitant to offer something for $29 that doesn't fit into the later category, and am giving the idea some thought. > I > agree with the post that said you should have separate pages for each of > your services and direct people to specific pages depending on what your > ad > is for so they can get specific information on what you offer, that fits > their needs. I'm wondering how to handle that on my home page. I think I need to give people two categories from which to choose, depending on whether they fit one profile or another (businesses or technical people). Otherwise, I try to direct the traffic from all of the ads I place to one page or another, both so that I can have a custom page for that ad, and also because I can pull up a page-by-page hit report in order to see who is going to which page and so forth. > Also, you need to have a contact form on every page. I don't see where you > sell a specific product for a specific price, so you need them to fill out > a > form, with all their contact info, and space for them to tell you whet > their > need is. I believe people prefer to send in their information thru a form, > not pick up a phone and call. Often people are surfing the net (even for > work) after business hours, and the form is easier for them. You mentioned that in your last post too. I'll probably put this one suggestion off until I get to the task of implementing a database-type content management system. I've always had problems with the cgi-like forms. They just crap out from time-to-time. > I would also suggest you offer them something in exchange for filling out > the contact form. It looks like in your business a "free" phone > consultation > would work well. I have to be careful about this. Currently, I offer a fixed price bid, which means that I have to understand the job in the first place, which tends to be more work than doing the actual work. Big projects are a different story. > People looking to use your services are probably looking > for advise on how to proceed. A 15 minute consultation would either send > them off in the right direction or give you an opportunity to write up a > proposal. If you can't do "free", offer a $29 consultation, and if you end > up doing work for them, apply that as a $29 discount. I bet many people > would pay $29 to get an down to earth answer to their question. I guess I have to think about this one for a while. Once I'm in touch with somebody I do a lot to generate good will. I'm afraid of getting sucked into $29 email consults that take three hours to complete. Once I get things down with this new business model I'll be able to stick my neck out a little, but I'm not quite ready to do that yet. Thanks, Mike | |||
| | #7 | ||
| "Wayne Lundberg" <Waynelund@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:cr1e1b02koq@enews4.newsguy.com... > > > "Mike Turco" <miketurco@yahoo-nospam4me.com> wrote in message > news:cqv9h70h80@enews3.newsguy.com... >> >> I've done a pretty good job of bringing traffic to my site and got about > --snip-- > > I think a 1% return is most impressive, I'd say excellent! When the best > direct mail campaign ever produced by the best in the business only expect > a > 2% return. So your cost per 'hit' is fabulous. Hi Wayne, Its closer to 1%, actually, and I guess its not too bad. I close about 1/2 of these jobs, and the other half really aren't qualified. I'm satisfied with the close ratio. What I really want to do is increase the call volume. I see three ways to do so: 1) I am currently on a pay-per-click plan that has an upper budged of $x/day. In order to reach that limit, my advertising provider ("provider") has to display my had however-many thousand times until a certain number of people click through. So first off, I can increase the daily budget which will, in theory, generate a proportional increase in click-throughs and calls. (I call this method "the lazy expensive way".) 2) Do a better job with my ads in terms of targeting my audience. If I do a better job of pre-qualifying people with my ads, my call ratio will improve. My provider may have to display my ad a greater number of times in order to hit the quota, but to an extent that is more their concern than mine. 3) Make whatever changes I can to the web page to improve its ability to take qualified prospects from the level of "just looking" to "I'm going to contact this guy." > As George King mentioned, you may want to fine tune your messages to > specific markets. That was my intention, the flaw was apparently in my implementation. > For example, when talking to a small business/person they > know their business and their market but don't have a clue as to the power > of the Internet and Office bundled software other than for writing an > invoice or a letter. Most don't know that once a piece of information is > put > into their system, that piece of information can be automatically inserted > anywhere it's needed without keystrokes. Few know how easy it would be to > put a wedge to scan data and to use bar-coding cheat sheets, or how to > have > their system automatically open Internet, do their market research, fish > for > new prospects all of this while they are asleep. In other words, they will > be earning money while sleeping. Those are very good points. My market has always been with people who are technically oriented and are aware of such possibilities. Even now, with my current campaign, I am reaching out to people who have a lot of the same skills I have. However, I do see the potential in what you're saying. To make a person mindful of these possibilities has incredible power when it comes to making sales. > How many small businesses do you know that have their email signature > option > set to automatically generate a boilerplate response, then put that > address > in a database for future mailings and follow-ups? What percentage of > businesses that you visit use the computer only for printing out a bill > and > don't even bother to scan incoming shipments via barcode, nor use these > features to their fullest? I have tried going after the "upgrade your application" market for quite a few years. I've had quite a bit of success with this in working with VAR's who want, for example, to add barcode features to their system and need some help. On a broader level, more along the lines of what you're suggesting, I've tried to no avail. I've offered free seminars, paid seminars, have mailed out educational booklets, etc. In another thread, you and I expressed different opinions regarding the possibility of bringing in new business by educating potential customers. I've never been good at this. I think what I can do, though, is start to publish articles such as what you are describing on my website. Once I start putting up such articles, I can start to experiment with a campaign to bring in the kinds of people you describe. The Internet is a very powerful tool when it comes to doing hands-on market research in this way. > My suggestion is to put some focus on small businesses that already have a > basic system and then you can walk them through bit by bit, as is your > expressed preference, until they gain mastery. Each customer will become a > long time client as you give them a weekly treat that with one click saves > them a minute. A minute saved every half hour of the day adds up. Continual improvement. That is the concept that has brought in tons of repeat business. I've never considered it to bring in new business because the need to bring in a consultant on an ongoing basis is not the message I've put across in my customer recruitment campaigns. > I'm sure you can demonstrate through an easy presentation just how a mom > and > pop garage can become fully automated by starting with just the basic > package and that over time they will learn to use the full features as you > develop them and install them for one click operation. "One click will > save > you a minute... every time, every day." At home businesses are another issue all together. For the most part I have always tried to stay away from them, although these new offerings, because they are limited in scope and specific, may allow me to open such doors in a meaningful way. Thanks for your input, Mike > > Wayne > > | |||
| | #8 | ||
| "Mike Turco" <miketurco@yahoo-nospam4me.com> wrote in message news:cralm201ddl@enews1.newsguy.com... > > > "Wayne Lundberg" <Waynelund@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:cr1e1b02koq@enews4.newsguy.com... > > > > > > "Mike Turco" <miketurco@yahoo-nospam4me.com> wrote in message > > news:cqv9h70h80@enews3.newsguy.com... > >> > >> I've done a pretty good job of bringing traffic to my site and got about > > --snip-- > > > > I think a 1% return is most impressive, I'd say excellent! When the best > > direct mail campaign ever produced by the best in the business only expect > > a > > 2% return. So your cost per 'hit' is fabulous. > > Hi Wayne, ----snip--- Something for all of us on the Internet to think about: Few business owners really understand the power of the PC on line. Few understand the power of bundled software, and even fewer understand the potential from combining these elements. This said, all our efforts in getting business via the Internet, Google, newsgroups and the like, is singing to the choir! The real challenge is in 'teaching' busy entrepreneurs who hardly ever even have time for a cup at the local Starbucks, how this evolving technology can be of value to them. Some examples: Yesterday I got an email from a process engineer client in Mexico looking for vulcanizing belt material. I did a Google and within five minutes found him a supplier. He replied later with a thank you note not only for the find, but for the reference to Thomas Registry where he found a local source in TJ. Yesterday working with another client who is having trouble getting his trademark registered through the patent office. I gave him my domain name registration site and urged him to buy the registration of his name before doing anything. If it was for sale the likelihood that it is a TM is remote. This is bypassing the old stogies at the patent office! Once in the public domain nobody can register it and it is his without the fees! So, Mike, I suggest you spend some time on the street with a list of things you can do for the uninitiated in this digital, Internet world. I'd say the roads are not paved with gold, but enough nuggets there to make it worth your time if not satisfied with a 1% return via the Internet. Wayne | |||
| Featured Websites | ||||
|
![]() |
| Tags: improving, lead, ratio, website |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Improving BMW E39 audio. | Mike G | Car audio | 5 | 06-18-2007 4:45 PM |
| Improving AM reception | Jim Murray | Car audio | 0 | 06-18-2007 11:39 AM |
| cpu ratio Q | GŠ | Central Processing Unit (CPU) and Overclocking | 1 | 06-18-2007 10:49 AM |
| How Do We Maintain the Constrained Ratio for the Rectangular Marquee? | vertigo | Graphics in general | 1 | 05-31-2007 6:34 PM |
| Featured Websites | ||||
|