![]() |
|
Welcome to the Computer Webmaster Gaming Console Graphics Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Website Advertising Or Marketing Advertising or marketing help needed, ask your questions here.
No Selling Here Please Use The Market Section! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 | ||
| Since Google is now central to the efforts of many marketers, I would like to propose the creation of a new word. Many of you reading this will know what I am talking about: Googlephobia [noun] The fear of all savvy web masters and Internet marketers that the slightest change to a web page may cause the site to be dropped from Google's search results. This is not an unfounded fear. I suffer from it myself. Search engines are becoming THE marketing tool for many companies, as is evidenced by the decline of trade shows. Google is the search engine of choice. For an increasing number of companies, getting dropped from Google means big trouble. The lesson? Marketers should be extremely wary of relying on "SEO" (search engine optimizers) who promise you top rankings in Google. They may get you top ranking for a month or two, but Google constantly tweaks their algorithms to weed out spammers. You may find your web site dropping to the very bottom of the search results, rendering your site invisible to your potential customers. Worse, your site may be banned forever. The best advice is to listen to Google! That means no monkey business. Just follow their advice here: http://www.google.com/intl/en/webmas...uidelines.html | |||
| Advertisements |
| | #2 | ||
| <louminatti@myway.com> wrote in message news:cq32dv0pge@enews3.newsguy.com... > > Since Google is now central to the efforts of many marketers, I would > like to propose the creation of a new word. Many of you reading this > will know what I am talking about: > > Googlephobia [noun] > The fear of all savvy web masters and Internet marketers that the > slightest change to a web page may cause the site to be dropped from > Google's search results. I know a few people who spend all their time fussing with their page in order to maintain their high ranking on google under certain rankings. I have one friend in particular who runs an affiliate-type website and makes his living that way. Its a day and night job. > > This is not an unfounded fear. I suffer from it myself. Search engines > are becoming THE marketing tool for many companies, as is evidenced by > the decline of trade shows. Google is the search engine of choice. For > an increasing number of companies, getting dropped from Google means > big trouble. The problem is that getting the edge on the search engines is an edge you won't be able to maintain. Over the next few years, I think, you're going to be facing a ton of foreign competition. If you think things are bad for programmers right now, boy, you just wait. This h1b and outsourcing craze is going to turn around and bite the ass of those who started it. What a pandorka's box! > The lesson? Marketers should be extremely wary of relying on "SEO" > (search engine optimizers) who promise you top rankings in Google. They > may get you top ranking for a month or two, but Google constantly > tweaks their algorithms to weed out spammers. G-d knows that we've talked more than enough about spammers on this group. I don't know that the word 'spammer' really applies. However, you do come across pages once in a while with all kinds of hidden text and crap like that. Given the way things are today, being able to be found on the Internet is critical. I've taken up advertising, myself. However, I think that coming up first and being found on the search engines themselves is more effective, and its certainly a lot cheaper. > You may find your web > site dropping to the very bottom of the search results, rendering your > site invisible to your potential customers. Worse, your site may be > banned forever. > > The best advice is to listen to Google! That means no monkey business. > Just follow their advice here: > http://www.google.com/intl/en/webmas...uidelines.html That was a good article. Here's a little tip: one thing I've found is that there are quite a few web pages out there that index the newsgroups, and when I'm searching for information, I often find links to newsgroup threads in which I've participated over the years. Being that google factors popularity into their ranking system, I have really lost out by not typing my url at the bottom of all of my posts. If I had been doing this all along throughout the years, which is a not-bad business practice, I bet my website would rank a lot better than it does now. (I don't think that anybody links to my page, anywhere.) Another mistake I've made, I think, is in not publishing articles to my website. Good articles do attract a lot of traffic, so they say. Mike http://miketurco.com | |||
| | #3 | ||
| Mike Turco wrote: > (I don't think that anybody links to my page, anywhere.) Google will tell you, enter link: before your site url (include a space after the colon) link: http://miketurco.com John www.enterpriseblue.com | |||
| | #4 | ||
| Interesting post. The Googlephobia I've seen is the fear of being INCLUDED in Google. Believe it or not quite a lot of business people are very uncomfortable with uncontrolled visiblity. More people than you think FEAR being in the public eye, speaking in public, having info about their business operations online etc. They tend to prefer and use PR agencies, publicists and so on to put out canned "messages." Needless to say, they don't blog either. | |||
| | #5 | ||
| "Mike Turco" <miketurco@yahoo-nospam4me.com> wrote in message news:cq5uiv0o2n@enews2.newsguy.com... > > > > The lesson? Marketers should be extremely wary of relying on "SEO" > > (search engine optimizers) who promise you top rankings in Google. They > > may get you top ranking for a month or two, but Google constantly > > tweaks their algorithms to weed out spammers. > > G-d knows that we've talked more than enough about spammers on this group. > > I don't know that the word 'spammer' really applies. However, you do come > across pages once in a while with all kinds of hidden text and crap like > that. Actually, spammer does apply. That's what Google calls it. Spamming the search index. The spammer in this case uses server tricks like SSI so the Google bot sees a page loaded with keywords and the page you see is different. If you click the "Cached" link you see what the Google bot saw. Google even has a complaint form for it. http://www.google.com/contact/spamreport.html -- McWebber No email replies read If someone tells you to forward an email to all your friends please forget that I'm your friend. | |||
| | #6 | ||
| louminatti@myway.com wrote: > The lesson? Marketers should be extremely wary of relying on "SEO" > (search engine optimizers) who promise you top rankings in Google. They > may get you top ranking for a month or two, but Google constantly > tweaks their algorithms to weed out spammers. You may find your web > site dropping to the very bottom of the search results, rendering your > site invisible to your potential customers. Worse, your site may be > banned forever. A follow-up to my own post. <g> Bookmark this URL: http://www.copyscape.com We were burned by a duplicate content penalty recently that nuked us on Google and Overture sites (Yahoo, MSN, etc.) If these search engines detect substantially identical content to your site, you will be banned. It took me quite some time to figure out what was going on. The search providers will not tell you why you're banned; Doing so would tip the spammers off on how to "game" the search results. Instead, they give you a rather vague list of "things not to do". The two culprits in our case were a surprise to me. First, there are scummy operations that have robots that go out and scrape your site's copy, then dump the copy into their own sites. The problem was also caused by our distributors! They were using our site's copy on their own sites, which resulted in about 10 substantially identical pages. Rather than annoy our distributors, we simply re-wrote our pages. Copyscape is an invaluable tool. It uses Google's API, so it displays the results Google actually has in its database. | |||
| | #7 | ||
| "McWebber" <mcwebber@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:cqdho401mb0@enews1.newsguy.com... > > "Redbox" <simplertech-news0719@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:cq7m9v01um@enews3.newsguy.com... >> >> Interesting post. The Googlephobia I've seen is the fear of being >> INCLUDED >> in Google. Believe it or not quite a lot of business people are very >> uncomfortable with uncontrolled visiblity. More people than you think >> FEAR >> being in the public eye, speaking in public, having info about their >> business operations online etc. They tend to prefer and use PR agencies, >> publicists and so on to put out canned "messages." > > Google obeys robots.txt so not being included in the Google index is > simple. > > -- > McWebber > True, if you have control over where the data is posted. Which is not always the case. A friend of mine is involved in a law suit. A search on the other parties lawyers name on Google found a listing on a long distance running club website. The lawyers full name, age, home address and home phone number were publicly posted in the list of race entrants. As one might image, there are some who might find a way to leverage that kind of gathered intelligence! | |||
| | #8 | ||
| "Redbox" <simplertech-news0719@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:cqfh490evl@enews2.newsguy.com... > > > "McWebber" <mcwebber@my-deja.com> wrote in message > news:cqdho401mb0@enews1.newsguy.com... > > Google obeys robots.txt so not being included in the Google index is > > simple. > > > > -- > > McWebber > > > > True, if you have control over where the data is posted. Which is not always > the case. A friend of mine is involved in a law suit. A search on the other > parties lawyers name on Google found a listing on a long distance running > club website. The lawyers full name, age, home address and home phone number > were publicly posted in the list of race entrants. As one might image, > there are some who might find a way to leverage that kind of gathered > intelligence! Generally you can find that information on any lawyer from public records anyway. Maybe not the home phone. The club is foolish to post such personal info in an unprotected directory. In this day and age such naivet is inexcusable. -- McWebber No email replies read If someone tells you to forward an email to all your friends please forget that I'm your friend. | |||
| Featured Websites | ||||
|
![]() |
| Tags: googlephobia |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| Featured Websites | ||||
|