![]() |
|
Welcome to the Computer Webmaster Gaming Console Graphics Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Ebay Technical Questions Ebay technical questions with listings, software, scripts and any other technical question you might have and need help with. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 | ||
| "MC_Emily" <nomore@mail.invalid> wrote in message news:bfpbi0$bdl$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk... > Following on from the thread 'Cancelling bids part two', if you bid on an > item on ebay are you entering into a legally binding contract or not. Some > say yes, some say no. Does anyone with a legal background know the correct > answer? > I suspect the problem is that it's never been tested in an English court - and I make that distinction very carefully. Ali | |||
|
| Advertisements |
| | #2 | ||
| "Ali Hopkins" <fn62@dial.pipex.com> wrote in message news:bfpbl8$hhibt$1@ID-97728.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "MC_Emily" <nomore@mail.invalid> wrote in message > news:bfpbi0$bdl$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk... > > Following on from the thread 'Cancelling bids part two', if you bid on an > > item on ebay are you entering into a legally binding contract or not. > Some > > say yes, some say no. Does anyone with a legal background know the > correct > > answer? > > > > I suspect the problem is that it's never been tested in an English court - > and I make that distinction very carefully. > > Ali > > One rider to my last message, Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts applies to contracts between traders and consumers where the term is to the detriment of the consumer. consumer-consumer and trader-trader sales are not regulated by this legislation ! | |||
|
| | #3 | ||
| "Stephen Dibble" <s.j.d@dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message news:3f2043e8$0$966$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com.. . > (In case your interested, I do have a legal background in consumer > legislation) > > Thought you might. The thing I love about lawyers and rabbis is that they all love debating minutiae and detail. And very valuable it is, too. Ali | |||
|
| | #4 | ||
| On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:40:27 +0100, "Stephen Dibble" <s.j.d@dsl.pipex.com> wrote: >"Ali Hopkins" <fn62@dial.pipex.com> wrote in message >news:bfpbl8$hhibt$1@ID-97728.news.uni-berlin.de... >> >> "MC_Emily" <nomore@mail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:bfpbi0$bdl$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk... >> > Following on from the thread 'Cancelling bids part two', if you bid on >an >> > item on ebay are you entering into a legally binding contract or not. >> Some >> > say yes, some say no. Does anyone with a legal background know the >> correct >> > answer? >> > >> >> I suspect the problem is that it's never been tested in an English court - >> and I make that distinction very carefully. >> >> Ali >> >> > >For auctions by bidding there seem to be three legal ways of interpreting >the formation of the agreement > >1) The sale is an auction (conducted by the seller, not eBay). Each bid is a >bid in an auction and, under section 57 of the Sale of Goods Act, can be >withdrawn prior to the end of the sale >2) The sale is not an auction. The page on eBay is an 'invitation to treat', >each bid is an offer and at the end of the sale the seller accepts the >highest offer (or not if they have good reason to). In contract law, an >offer can be withdrawn from at any time prior to acceptance >3) The sale is not an auction. The page on eBay is a conditional offer, and >each bid is a conditional acceptance. Therefore, each bid forms a legally >binding contract. The conditions of the contract is that it only binding on >the seller if at the end of the sale, the buyer is the highest bidder. The >buyer is unconditionally bound. > Ive always gone with No2 I dont accept that it IS a legal contrat and that if it IS then the distance selling rules come into place. I also consider that Ebay must take some legal responsibility as an 'Agent', over and above the ridiculous amounts they offer as compensation | |||
|
| | #5 | ||
| On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:40:27 +0100, "Stephen Dibble" <s.j.d@dsl.pipex.com> wrote: >"Ali Hopkins" <fn62@dial.pipex.com> wrote in message >news:bfpbl8$hhibt$1@ID-97728.news.uni-berlin.de... >> >> "MC_Emily" <nomore@mail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:bfpbi0$bdl$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk... >> > Following on from the thread 'Cancelling bids part two', if you bid on >an >> > item on ebay are you entering into a legally binding contract or not. >> Some >> > say yes, some say no. Does anyone with a legal background know the >> correct >> > answer? >> > >> >> I suspect the problem is that it's never been tested in an English court - >> and I make that distinction very carefully. >> >> Ali >> >> > >For auctions by bidding there seem to be three legal ways of interpreting >the formation of the agreement > >1) The sale is an auction (conducted by the seller, not eBay). Each bid is a >bid in an auction and, under section 57 of the Sale of Goods Act, can be >withdrawn prior to the end of the sale >2) The sale is not an auction. The page on eBay is an 'invitation to treat', >each bid is an offer and at the end of the sale the seller accepts the >highest offer (or not if they have good reason to). In contract law, an >offer can be withdrawn from at any time prior to acceptance >3) The sale is not an auction. The page on eBay is a conditional offer, and >each bid is a conditional acceptance. Therefore, each bid forms a legally >binding contract. The conditions of the contract is that it only binding on >the seller if at the end of the sale, the buyer is the highest bidder. The >buyer is unconditionally bound. > >In case 1&2, the bid is NOT a legally binding contract, whereas in case 3 >the bid IS. > Can you withdraw a bid in ebay ? AFAIK you *can* - there is a process for withdrawing a bid. In which case....... even under points 1 and 2 where merely making a bid does not form the contract.... *however* closing the sale with your bd highest *does* form a contract...... - this means in practise the result is the same. Even if your bid (unaccepted) doesn't form a contract - if you are highest at the close a contract is formed. Even if a bid is a contact - it can be legally and legitimately rescinded.... which is the same in effect. Anyway......... Fuzzyman >However, there is an extra dimension to this matter which came into effect >on April 1st 2003. A change in the law mean that a sale by a trader to a >consumer on eBay is definately a consumer sale.Therefore, the Unfair Terms >in Consumer Contract Regulations come into effect for the contract. Whilst >untested, it is highly likely that a contract term which conditionally binds >the seller, which unconditionally binds the buyer will fail the test of >fairness and therefore will be void ! It is for the courts to decide, but I >strongly suspect that option 3 breaches these regulations and therefore >cannot be binding. > >Which is correct is anyones guess. The law does not define auction, only for >'sale by competitive bidding''. It is possible that , whether a sale by >competitive bidding is an auction, is a matter of decision of the >seller.Certainly, it is possible to have a sale by competitive bidding which >is not an auction, for example a 'Mock Auction'. > >For 'Buy It Now', the issues are similar. Again three options exist > >1) The eBay page is an invitation to treat. The bid is an offer and the >computer acts for the seller in accepting by closing the sale and the >contract is binding. >2) The eBay page is an invitation to treat. The bid is an offer, the sale >ends, but until the seller explicitely accepts the contract is not binding >3) The eBay page is an offer. The bid is a acceptance and the contract is >binding. > >Option 2 seems unlikely and options 1 & 3 have the same effect in real >terms. Personally, I think option 1 is the most likely. > >At the end of the day, this will need testing in the courts. Whether this >will be by way of a civil dispute following a sale or legal action against a >seller for breach of Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations I dont >know. > >You never know, it may be none of the above. ! > >(In case your interested, I do have a legal background in consumer >legislation) > --- Everyone has talent. What is rare is the courage to follow talent to the dark place where it leads. -Erica Jong Ambition is a poor excuse for not having sense enough to be lazy. -Milan Kundera http://www.voidspace.org.uk Where Headspace Meets Cyberspace Cyberpunk and Science Resource Site Exploring the worlds of Psychology, Spirituality, Science and Computing -- http://www.fuchsiashockz.co.uk http://groups.yahoo.com/group/void-shockz http://www.learnlandrover.com | |||
|
| Featured Websites | ||||
|
![]() |
| Tags: binding, contract, legally |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| Featured Websites | ||||
|