WHY do I have to uninstall other Norton products to install new Norton?

Walter Mautner spewed out this bit, and i'll scatter a few bits myself:

> carlton.pemberbrook@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> My mom has a Norton firewall - works well enough.
>> She just send much $$$ on new Norton software CD - essentially Norton
>> Antivirus I think.
>>
>> Does Norton always insist on getting rid of perfectly functioning
>> products like NOorton Firewall just to use their new software?
>>
>> I am DEEPLY afraid that dumping her Firewall - that she paid good
>> money for - will make me regret this action.
>> Anyway to have 2 Norton products installed side by side - and not
>> have Norton force you to dump one of them?
>> Or is this the way Norton assures that you will always need to buy
>> new products from them?
>>
> Depends upon what she paid - when she had the internet security
> product and not paid the extra tax anymore, it will be replaced by
> the crippled version that comes with the av product, called "worm
> blocker".
> Usually the importance of a "desktop firewall" is overestimated - the
> windows xp firewall blocks incomings just fine, and the
> outgoing "home-phoning" programs and maybe spyware that a "desktop
> firewall" (see the nonsense of that term, imagine the desktop burning
> with the firewall on it *eg*) may moan about, could as well be caught
> by brain1.0, setting up a "restricted user" account for mailing and
> surfing, and weekly antispyware scans (spybot s&d with added registry
> protection "teatimer", adaware ...). Both of them are freeware ...

Maybe it's just me, damned if i know. But, what you've just wrote confuses
the **** right up outa me. Leaves me looking at the screen somewhat like
this....

http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~gng/confused.jpg

http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Union/Br...1/Confused.JPG

http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/03.09.18_Goin'%20Down%20To%20Cowtown/41_At%20Least%20As%20Confused%20As%20He%20Looks.jp g


--
Mhzjunkie

1 PRINT "Windows Vista ERROR"
GOTO 1
END

Mhzjunkie <newsabuse@gmail.com> Thou hackberry. Thou howling monster.
Thou preposterous ass. Thou whoreson loggerhead. Ye chatted and ye
tehee'd:

> Walter Mautner spewed out this bit, and i'll scatter a few bits
> myself:
>> carlton.pemberbrook@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> My mom has a Norton firewall - works well enough.
>>> She just send much $$$ on new Norton software CD - essentially
>>> Norton Antivirus I think.
>>>
>>> Does Norton always insist on getting rid of perfectly functioning
>>> products like NOorton Firewall just to use their new software?
>>>
>>> I am DEEPLY afraid that dumping her Firewall - that she paid good
>>> money for - will make me regret this action.
>>> Anyway to have 2 Norton products installed side by side - and not
>>> have Norton force you to dump one of them?
>>> Or is this the way Norton assures that you will always need to buy
>>> new products from them?
>>>
>> Depends upon what she paid - when she had the internet security
>> product and not paid the extra tax anymore, it will be replaced by
>> the crippled version that comes with the av product, called "worm
>> blocker".
>> Usually the importance of a "desktop firewall" is overestimated - the
>> windows xp firewall blocks incomings just fine, and the
>> outgoing "home-phoning" programs and maybe spyware that a "desktop
>> firewall" (see the nonsense of that term, imagine the desktop burning
>> with the firewall on it *eg*) may moan about, could as well be caught
>> by brain1.0, setting up a "restricted user" account for mailing and
>> surfing, and weekly antispyware scans (spybot s&d with added registry
>> protection "teatimer", adaware ...). Both of them are freeware ...
>
> Maybe it's just me, damned if i know. But, what you've just wrote
> confuses the **** right up outa me. Leaves me looking at the screen
> somewhat like this....
>
> http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~gng/confused.jpg
>
> http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Union/Br...1/Confused.JPG
>
> http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/03.09.18_Goin'%20Down%20To%20Cowtown/41_At%20Least%20As%20Confused%20As%20He%20Looks.jp g

Oh my goodness. I'll find the orginal... Thanks junkie.

> Depends upon what she paid - when she had the internet security
> product and not paid the extra tax anymore, it will be replaced by
> the crippled version that comes with the av product, called "worm
> blocker". Usually the importance of a "desktop firewall" is
> overestimated - the
> windows xp firewall blocks incomings just fine, and the
> outgoing "home-phoning" programs and maybe spyware that a "desktop
> firewall" (see the nonsense of that term, imagine the desktop burning
> with the firewall on it *eg*) may moan about, could as well be caught
> by brain1.0, setting up a "restricted user" account for mailing and
> surfing, and weekly antispyware scans (spybot s&d with added registry
> protection "teatimer", adaware ...). Both of them are freeware ...

Bluh bluh.

news:t5mjb4-gq6.ln1@Woodpecker.woodpecker.fdns.net

Walter Mautner is nominated for Goofy Azzed Babboon...

"This award commemorates Kookistic achievement in the linguistic arts. Of
any language. To be awarded for categorical instances of such achievement,
but if a fully separate category of it is exhibited by said Kook then they
can win it more than once. There is no statute of limitations here; one
should award net.kooks of the past as well as the present. Linguistic
butchering is, we believe, a demonstrably proven Kook Art. If the person's
inability to use language comes from their inexperience with it they do not
qualify. Kooky language must come from Kooky thought."

Fecunds, anyone?

--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.

Vescere puter subgalia meis.

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:53:38 +0545, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

> Mhzjunkie <newsabuse@gmail.com> Thou hackberry. Thou howling monster.
> Thou preposterous ass. Thou whoreson loggerhead. Ye chatted and ye
> tehee'd:
>
>> Walter Mautner spewed out this bit, and i'll scatter a few bits
>> myself:
>>> carlton.pemberbrook@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> My mom has a Norton firewall - works well enough.
>>>> She just send much $$$ on new Norton software CD - essentially
>>>> Norton Antivirus I think.
>>>>
>>>> Does Norton always insist on getting rid of perfectly functioning
>>>> products like NOorton Firewall just to use their new software?
>>>>
>>>> I am DEEPLY afraid that dumping her Firewall - that she paid good
>>>> money for - will make me regret this action.
>>>> Anyway to have 2 Norton products installed side by side - and not
>>>> have Norton force you to dump one of them?
>>>> Or is this the way Norton assures that you will always need to buy
>>>> new products from them?
>>>>
>>> Depends upon what she paid - when she had the internet security
>>> product and not paid the extra tax anymore, it will be replaced by
>>> the crippled version that comes with the av product, called "worm
>>> blocker".
>>> Usually the importance of a "desktop firewall" is overestimated - the
>>> windows xp firewall blocks incomings just fine, and the
>>> outgoing "home-phoning" programs and maybe spyware that a "desktop
>>> firewall" (see the nonsense of that term, imagine the desktop burning
>>> with the firewall on it *eg*) may moan about, could as well be caught
>>> by brain1.0, setting up a "restricted user" account for mailing and
>>> surfing, and weekly antispyware scans (spybot s&d with added registry
>>> protection "teatimer", adaware ...). Both of them are freeware ...
>>
>> Maybe it's just me, damned if i know. But, what you've just wrote
>> confuses the **** right up outa me. Leaves me looking at the screen
>> somewhat like this....
>>
>> http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~gng/confused.jpg
>>
>> http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Union/Br...1/Confused.JPG
>>
>> http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/03.09.18_Goin'%20Down%20To%20Cowtown/41_At%20Least%20As%20Confused%20As%20He%20Looks.jp g
>
> Oh my goodness. I'll find the orginal... Thanks junkie.
>
>> Depends upon what she paid - when she had the internet security
>> product and not paid the extra tax anymore, it will be replaced by
>> the crippled version that comes with the av product, called "worm
>> blocker". Usually the importance of a "desktop firewall" is
>> overestimated - the
>> windows xp firewall blocks incomings just fine, and the
>> outgoing "home-phoning" programs and maybe spyware that a "desktop
>> firewall" (see the nonsense of that term, imagine the desktop burning
>> with the firewall on it *eg*) may moan about, could as well be caught
>> by brain1.0, setting up a "restricted user" account for mailing and
>> surfing, and weekly antispyware scans (spybot s&d with added registry
>> protection "teatimer", adaware ...). Both of them are freeware ...
>
> Bluh bluh.
>
> news:t5mjb4-gq6.ln1@Woodpecker.woodpecker.fdns.net
>
> Walter Mautner is nominated for Goofy Azzed Babboon...
>
> "This award commemorates Kookistic achievement in the linguistic arts. Of
> any language. To be awarded for categorical instances of such achievement,
> but if a fully separate category of it is exhibited by said Kook then they
> can win it more than once. There is no statute of limitations here; one
> should award net.kooks of the past as well as the present. Linguistic
> butchering is, we believe, a demonstrably proven Kook Art. If the person's
> inability to use language comes from their inexperience with it they do not
> qualify. Kooky language must come from Kooky thought."
>
> Fecunds, anyone?

**** yes !

--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004

COOSN-266-06-25794

Kadaitcha Man spewed out this bit, and i'll scatter a few bits myself:

> Mhzjunkie <newsabuse@gmail.com> Thou hackberry. Thou howling monster.
> Thou preposterous ass. Thou whoreson loggerhead. Ye chatted and ye
> tehee'd:
>
>> Walter Mautner spewed out this bit, and i'll scatter a few bits
>> myself:
>>> carlton.pemberbrook@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> My mom has a Norton firewall - works well enough.
>>>> She just send much $$$ on new Norton software CD - essentially
>>>> Norton Antivirus I think.
>>>>
>>>> Does Norton always insist on getting rid of perfectly functioning
>>>> products like NOorton Firewall just to use their new software?
>>>>
>>>> I am DEEPLY afraid that dumping her Firewall - that she paid good
>>>> money for - will make me regret this action.
>>>> Anyway to have 2 Norton products installed side by side - and not
>>>> have Norton force you to dump one of them?
>>>> Or is this the way Norton assures that you will always need to buy
>>>> new products from them?
>>>>
>>> Depends upon what she paid - when she had the internet security
>>> product and not paid the extra tax anymore, it will be replaced by
>>> the crippled version that comes with the av product, called "worm
>>> blocker".
>>> Usually the importance of a "desktop firewall" is overestimated -
>>> the windows xp firewall blocks incomings just fine, and the
>>> outgoing "home-phoning" programs and maybe spyware that a "desktop
>>> firewall" (see the nonsense of that term, imagine the desktop
>>> burning with the firewall on it *eg*) may moan about, could as well
>>> be caught by brain1.0, setting up a "restricted user" account for
>>> mailing and surfing, and weekly antispyware scans (spybot s&d with
>>> added registry protection "teatimer", adaware ...). Both of them
>>> are freeware ...
>>
>> Maybe it's just me, damned if i know. But, what you've just wrote
>> confuses the **** right up outa me. Leaves me looking at the screen
>> somewhat like this....
>>
>> http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~gng/confused.jpg
>>
>> http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Union/Br...1/Confused.JPG
>>
>> http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/03.09.18_Goin'%20Down%20To%20Cowtown/41_At%20Least%20As%20Confused%20As%20He%20Looks.jp g
>
> Oh my goodness. I'll find the orginal... Thanks junkie.
>
>> Depends upon what she paid - when she had the internet security
>> product and not paid the extra tax anymore, it will be replaced by
>> the crippled version that comes with the av product, called "worm
>> blocker". Usually the importance of a "desktop firewall" is
>> overestimated - the
>> windows xp firewall blocks incomings just fine, and the
>> outgoing "home-phoning" programs and maybe spyware that a "desktop
>> firewall" (see the nonsense of that term, imagine the desktop burning
>> with the firewall on it *eg*) may moan about, could as well be caught
>> by brain1.0, setting up a "restricted user" account for mailing and
>> surfing, and weekly antispyware scans (spybot s&d with added registry
>> protection "teatimer", adaware ...). Both of them are freeware ...
>
> Bluh bluh.
>
> news:t5mjb4-gq6.ln1@Woodpecker.woodpecker.fdns.net
>
> Walter Mautner is nominated for Goofy Azzed Babboon...
>
> "This award commemorates Kookistic achievement in the linguistic
> arts. Of any language. To be awarded for categorical instances of
> such achievement, but if a fully separate category of it is exhibited
> by said Kook then they can win it more than once. There is no statute
> of limitations here; one should award net.kooks of the past as well
> as the present. Linguistic butchering is, we believe, a demonstrably
> proven Kook Art. If the person's inability to use language comes from
> their inexperience with it they do not qualify. Kooky language must
> come from Kooky thought."
>
> Fecunds, anyone?

<Holds hand up>

--
Mhzjunkie

1 PRINT "Windows Vista ERROR"
GOTO 1
END

Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local> wrote in message
<pan.2007.03.02.04.07.30.150831@nntp.sun-meatplow.local>...

> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:53:38 +0545, Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>
>> Mhzjunkie <newsabuse@gmail.com> Thou hackberry. Thou howling monster.
>> Thou preposterous ass. Thou whoreson loggerhead. Ye chatted and ye
>> tehee'd:
>>
>>> Walter Mautner spewed out this bit, and i'll scatter a few bits
>>> myself:
>>>> carlton.pemberbrook@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My mom has a Norton firewall - works well enough.
>>>>> She just send much $$$ on new Norton software CD - essentially
>>>>> Norton Antivirus I think.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does Norton always insist on getting rid of perfectly functioning
>>>>> products like NOorton Firewall just to use their new software?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am DEEPLY afraid that dumping her Firewall - that she paid good
>>>>> money for - will make me regret this action.
>>>>> Anyway to have 2 Norton products installed side by side - and not
>>>>> have Norton force you to dump one of them?
>>>>> Or is this the way Norton assures that you will always need to buy
>>>>> new products from them?
>>>>>
>>>> Depends upon what she paid - when she had the internet security
>>>> product and not paid the extra tax anymore, it will be replaced by
>>>> the crippled version that comes with the av product, called "worm
>>>> blocker".
>>>> Usually the importance of a "desktop firewall" is overestimated -
>>>> the windows xp firewall blocks incomings just fine, and the
>>>> outgoing "home-phoning" programs and maybe spyware that a "desktop
>>>> firewall" (see the nonsense of that term, imagine the desktop
>>>> burning with the firewall on it *eg*) may moan about, could as
>>>> well be caught by brain1.0, setting up a "restricted user" account
>>>> for mailing and surfing, and weekly antispyware scans (spybot s&d
>>>> with added registry protection "teatimer", adaware ...). Both of
>>>> them are freeware ...
>>>
>>> Maybe it's just me, damned if i know. But, what you've just wrote
>>> confuses the **** right up outa me. Leaves me looking at the screen
>>> somewhat like this....
>>>
>>> http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~gng/confused.jpg
>>>
>>> http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Union/Br...1/Confused.JPG
>>>
>>> http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/03.09.18_Goin'%20Down%20To%20Cowtown/41_At%20Least%20As%20Confused%20As%20He%20Looks.jp g
>>
>> Oh my goodness. I'll find the orginal... Thanks junkie.
>>
>>> Depends upon what she paid - when she had the internet security
>>> product and not paid the extra tax anymore, it will be replaced by
>>> the crippled version that comes with the av product, called "worm
>>> blocker". Usually the importance of a "desktop firewall" is
>>> overestimated - the
>>> windows xp firewall blocks incomings just fine, and the
>>> outgoing "home-phoning" programs and maybe spyware that a "desktop
>>> firewall" (see the nonsense of that term, imagine the desktop
>>> burning with the firewall on it *eg*) may moan about, could as well
>>> be caught by brain1.0, setting up a "restricted user" account for
>>> mailing and surfing, and weekly antispyware scans (spybot s&d with
>>> added registry protection "teatimer", adaware ...). Both of them
>>> are freeware ...
>>
>> Bluh bluh.
>>
>> news:t5mjb4-gq6.ln1@Woodpecker.woodpecker.fdns.net
>>
>> Walter Mautner is nominated for Goofy Azzed Babboon...
>>
>> "This award commemorates Kookistic achievement in the linguistic
>> arts. Of any language. To be awarded for categorical instances of
>> such achievement, but if a fully separate category of it is
>> exhibited by said Kook then they can win it more than once. There is
>> no statute of limitations here; one should award net.kooks of the
>> past as well as the present. Linguistic butchering is, we believe, a
>> demonstrably proven Kook Art. If the person's inability to use
>> language comes from their inexperience with it they do not qualify.
>> Kooky language must come from Kooky thought."
>>
>> Fecunds, anyone?
>
> **** yes !

<tips sombrer0>

Mhzjunkie wrote:

....
> Maybe it's just me, damned if i know. But, what you've just wrote confuses
> the **** right up outa me. Leaves me looking at the screen somewhat like
> this....
>
> http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~gng/confused.jpg
>
> http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Union/Br...1/Confused.JPG
>
>
http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/03.09.18_Goin'%20Down%20To%20Cowtown/41_At%20Least%20As%20Confused%20As%20He%20Looks.jp g
>
Scared looks
In simple words: the "personal firewalls" on a windows "client" pc are more
adware for their vendors then useful protection: easier to circumvent by
trojans and spyware than a good solution combined of brain1.0, restricted
permissions and scans with dedicated antispyware software, but giving a
cozy feeling due to frequent warnings about non-existent "intrusion
attempts" blocked.
That cozy feeling indeed tends to make Mr. Surfer incautiously visit sites
he/she wouldn't touch with a asbestous glove otherwise.
That all in addition to the proven fact that symantec/norton antivirus
softwares are like burdocks: hogging resources and hard to remove.
--
vista policy violation: Microsoft optical mouse found penguin patterns
on mousepad. Partition scan in progress to remove offending
incompatible products. Reactivate MS software.
Linux 2.6.17-mm1,Xorg7.1/nvidia [LinuxCounter#295241,ICQ#4918962]

Walter Mautner spewed out this bit, and i'll scatter a few bits myself:

> Mhzjunkie wrote:
>
> ...
>> Maybe it's just me, damned if i know. But, what you've just wrote
>> confuses the **** right up outa me. Leaves me looking at the screen
>> somewhat like this....
>>
>> http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~gng/confused.jpg
>>
>> http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Union/Br...1/Confused.JPG
>>
>>
> http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/03.09.18_Goin'%20Down%20To%20Cowtown/41_At%20Least%20As%20Confused%20As%20He%20Looks.jp g
>>
> Scared looks
> In simple words: the "personal firewalls" on a windows "client" pc
> are more adware for their vendors then useful protection: easier to
> circumvent by trojans and spyware than a good solution combined of
> brain1.0, restricted permissions and scans with dedicated antispyware
> software, but giving a cozy feeling due to frequent warnings about
> non-existent "intrusion attempts" blocked.
> That cozy feeling indeed tends to make Mr. Surfer incautiously visit
> sites he/she wouldn't touch with a asbestous glove otherwise.
> That all in addition to the proven fact that symantec/norton antivirus
> softwares are like burdocks: hogging resources and hard to remove.

http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~gng/confused.jpg

--
Mhzjunkie

1 PRINT "Windows Vista ERROR"
GOTO 1
END