![]() |
|
Welcome to the Computer Webmaster Gaming Console Graphics Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 | ||
| When the VBR option is selected in CDex it gives you a choice for the min and max bitrates. When I tried 40K and 320K respectively the file size was similar to a track encoded at 160K. Can't hear much difference in quality. What would the advantage be(if any) of doing it this way, or should I be selecting different min and maxes? Jim. | |||
| Advertisements |
| | #2 | ||
| Jim Murray wrote: > When the VBR option is selected in CDex it gives you a choice for the > min and max bitrates. When I tried 40K and 320K respectively the file > size was similar to a track encoded at 160K. Can't hear much > difference in quality. Are you saying you can't hear much difference in quality between 40kbps MP3 and 320kbps MP3? What equipment are you playing the files back on? If you're playing the tracks through a crappy sound card and crappy PC speakers then that is about the worst playback system you could imagine... Burn a CD with tracks that are encoded at different bit rates and then play the tracks back on a hi-fi system and if you can't hear much difference in quality between 40kbps and 320kbps MP3 then you should get your hearing checked out, seriously. > What would the advantage be(if any) of doing it this way, or should > I be selecting different min and maxes? VBR (variable vit rate) allows smaller file sizes for a given level of audio quality compared to CBR (constant bit rate) or ABR (average bit rate). It works by assessing what bit rate to use on a frame-by-frame (an MP3 frame lasts a few milliseconds) so that easy to encode frames can be encoded with a lower bit rate, and more difficult to encode frames can be encoded with a higher bit rate, so the bit rate is optimised for a given level of audio quality. I use Razor Lame to encode MP3: http://www.dors.de/razorlame/index.php because it has a set of VBR, CBR and ABR presets that set the encoder up with parameters that were selected by knowledgable people in the internet audio coding community. To use the presets you just click the Lame icon then: Load Options => Presets => VBR => then select one of the presets files in that folder and click Open. If you can't tell the difference between 40kbps and 320kbps then the VBR Standard.rlo preset file would be the best choice for you. I use the VBR Extreme.rlo preset, which is overkill, but memory and CD-Rs are very cheap and I just prefer to have a very high chance of the encoding having high audio quality while still taking advantage of the better compression performance that VBR allows. -- Steve - http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ - Digital Radio News & Info DAB sounds worse than Freeview, digital satellite, cable, broadband internet and FM | |||
| | #3 | ||
| "Jim Murray" <jimmurray@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:<brneul$noi$1@kermit.esat.net>... > When the VBR option is selected in CDex it gives you a choice for the min > and max bitrates. When I tried 40K and 320K respectively the file size was > similar to a track encoded at 160K. Can't hear much difference in quality. > > What would the advantage be(if any) of doing it this way, or should I be > selecting different min and maxes? VBR is superior because segments of the song that do not need a high fidelity use a lower bitrate, and areas of greater importance get the higher. It really depends of the song. I'd stick with VBR, it will save a considerable amount of space, espically if your a heavy ripper. Cheers, John Dziurlaj | |||
| | #4 | ||
| Obviously I can hear a difference between 160K and 40K. What I mean is that within CDex you can choose upper and lower limits for VBR to use. I tried 320K and 40K as a trial and as I say the file size was similar to encoding at 160K constant. I was really looking for some advice re these upper amd lower limits. I'll download Razorlame and have a play, sounds like it could be setup for VBR with a more useful set of options. Having said all that when I play tracks encoded at 160K constant in my car player and then play the original audio CD I can't really hear any difference between them. I'm happy with the quality, just trying to get a smaller file size. Thanks for all the help, Jim. "the real DAB sounds worse than FM" <email_me@via_my_website.co.uk> wrote in message news:bTDFb.242$Eu.268426@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net... > Jim Murray wrote: > > When the VBR option is selected in CDex it gives you a choice for the > > min and max bitrates. When I tried 40K and 320K respectively the file > > size was similar to a track encoded at 160K. Can't hear much > > difference in quality. > > > Are you saying you can't hear much difference in quality between 40kbps MP3 > and 320kbps MP3? What equipment are you playing the files back on? If you're > playing the tracks through a crappy sound card and crappy PC speakers then > that is about the worst playback system you could imagine... > > Burn a CD with tracks that are encoded at different bit rates and then play > the tracks back on a hi-fi system and if you can't hear much difference in > quality between 40kbps and 320kbps MP3 then you should get your hearing > checked out, seriously. > > > > What would the advantage be(if any) of doing it this way, or should > > I be selecting different min and maxes? > > > VBR (variable vit rate) allows smaller file sizes for a given level of audio > quality compared to CBR (constant bit rate) or ABR (average bit rate). It > works by assessing what bit rate to use on a frame-by-frame (an MP3 frame > lasts a few milliseconds) so that easy to encode frames can be encoded with > a lower bit rate, and more difficult to encode frames can be encoded with a > higher bit rate, so the bit rate is optimised for a given level of audio > quality. > > I use Razor Lame to encode MP3: > > http://www.dors.de/razorlame/index.php > > because it has a set of VBR, CBR and ABR presets that set the encoder up > with parameters that were selected by knowledgable people in the internet > audio coding community. To use the presets you just click the Lame icon > then: > > Load Options => Presets => VBR => then select one of the presets files in > that folder and click Open. > > If you can't tell the difference between 40kbps and 320kbps then the VBR > Standard.rlo preset file would be the best choice for you. I use the VBR > Extreme.rlo preset, which is overkill, but memory and CD-Rs are very cheap > and I just prefer to have a very high chance of the encoding having high > audio quality while still taking advantage of the better compression > performance that VBR allows. > > > -- > Steve - http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/ - Digital Radio News & Info > > DAB sounds worse than Freeview, digital satellite, cable, broadband > internet and FM > > | |||
| Featured Websites | ||||
|
![]() |
| Tags: bit, rates, vbr |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MP3 bit rates for in-car | H | Car audio | 7 | 06-17-2007 7:26 PM |
| OFFSHORE E-BUSINESS AT AFFORDABLE RATES! | George Lecompte | Building An Internet Business | 0 | 05-29-2007 2:31 AM |
| Get Huge Interest Rates (1-2%/ day) | Pai Pal | Building An Internet Business | 0 | 05-29-2007 2:25 AM |
| Going Rates for a Website | Fred Atkinson | Website Reviews And Website Questions | 3 | 05-28-2007 12:07 AM |
| Featured Websites | ||||
|