SPOILER ALERT - Halo 3 Rumor....

Okay, here is something to chew on.

How long did it take to make HALO 1?

Now how long did it take to make HALO 2?

Rumor that Halo 3 is originally part of HALO 2, but could not logically fit
it all in a disc. So they cut it up, and finished Part A (Halo 2) and sent
that out to us.

Now working on finishing up Part B (Halo 3), so it will be released on Feb.
9th 2005.

If you think about it, they had a lot of "Earth" levels on demo or at the
Expo, but never appeared in the game.

And as for the length of time it took to make HALO 2, could it be logically
that the game was expected to be longer than HALO 1, but it was not so. SO
where did all that extra months go in making the game, could it be HALO 3?


Just some thoughts, I wanted to tell someone, my wife is sick of me talking
about Halo.

Thanks!

Cheers,
PQ

where did you get the date Feb 9th 2005? I does seem a feasible idea, and
would certainly clear up a lot of the fuss around H2 right now. The H2
ending absolutely screams H3. If there isn't a H3, frankly I'll be sooooo
pissed off - i HATE pointless cliffhanger endings. Besides, the point of
most cliff-hanger endings is that after a certain period of time they are
RESOLVED. For example in between seasons, to keep the viewer interested and
hooked. Well, except for Farscape but don't get me started on that! Hey,
maybe Bungie - like the Farscape tv networks - ran out of cash?? LOL
"Phyber Quest" <phyberquest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:BDC0D037.52D1%phyberquest@yahoo.com...
> Okay, here is something to chew on.
>
> How long did it take to make HALO 1?
>
> Now how long did it take to make HALO 2?
>
> Rumor that Halo 3 is originally part of HALO 2, but could not logically
fit
> it all in a disc. So they cut it up, and finished Part A (Halo 2) and sent
> that out to us.
>
> Now working on finishing up Part B (Halo 3), so it will be released on
Feb.
> 9th 2005.
>
> If you think about it, they had a lot of "Earth" levels on demo or at the
> Expo, but never appeared in the game.
>
> And as for the length of time it took to make HALO 2, could it be
logically
> that the game was expected to be longer than HALO 1, but it was not so. SO
> where did all that extra months go in making the game, could it be HALO 3?
>
>
> Just some thoughts, I wanted to tell someone, my wife is sick of me
talking
> about Halo.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> PQ
>

I highly doubt that Bungie ran out of cash because they sold around 5 million copies of the game already. If they make a halo 3 they will sell even more since H1 sold over 3 million in 3 years H2 5 million in about a month H3 will sell a huge amount.

--
Message posted via http://www.xboxjunkies.com

"Tim.T" <jblack 2001 at btopenworld dot com> wrote in message
news:ekLNmFk2EHA.2804@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> where did you get the date Feb 9th 2005?

Enough on this already. There was a rumor floating around that if you beat
the entire game Legendary, it would show that date at the end. Bungie has
denied it.

Bungie's not running out of money. They're owned by Microsoft which just
gave $32 Billion back to its stockholders because it had too much cash.

"Jeff Fink" <jfinkjfink@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:u4GeAn72EHA.2624@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> "Tim.T" <jblack 2001 at btopenworld dot com> wrote in message
> news:ekLNmFk2EHA.2804@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > where did you get the date Feb 9th 2005?
>
> Enough on this already. There was a rumor floating around that if you
beat
> the entire game Legendary, it would show that date at the end. Bungie has
> denied it.
>
> Bungie's not running out of money. They're owned by Microsoft which just
> gave $32 Billion back to its stockholders because it had too much cash.

And Bungie is, apparently, no longer in control of the artistic content.