Capcom cuts nuts off PS3 exclusivity, Blig Merk howls in pain

On Mar 27, 12:31 am, "Android" <androv...@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote:
> > > A new week, a new exclusive lost.
>
> > You mean the 360 never even had it as an exclusive? Ouch!
>
> Good thing the 360 is keeping Lost Planet and Dead Rising as exclusives.
> Oh, wait...

Yeah, exclusives are going the way of the Dodo bird. But, this hurts
Sony a *LOT* more than it hurts MS.

Sony DEPENDED on its exclusives for the PS2 (and with a HUGE market
share, they could demand them easily and bully developers around). Now
Sony finds itself on the same playing field with MS and Nintendo. Must
be a rude awakening.

Besides, MS has a lot more (and better) first party titles than Sony.
Sony has NOTHING that compares to a Halo 3.

If MS were to pick up another huge win like a MGS 4 or a WoW port,
Sony execs might as well start sharpening their swords for Seppuku.

-Eric

On Mar 27, 12:31 am, "Android" <androv...@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > A new week, a new exclusive lost.
>
> > > You mean the 360 never even had it as an exclusive? Ouch!


> Good thing the 360 is keeping Lost Planet and Dead Rising as exclusives.
> Oh, wait...

What makes you think Dead Rising is going multi-platform?

....senior director of strategic planning and research Christian
Svensson, reacting to the whole Devil May Cry 4 multiplatform outcry,
stated "Dead Rising and Lost Planet are not slated to appear on Wii or
PS3

On Mar 29, 6:43 am, elro...@pop.uky.edu wrote:
> On Mar 27, 12:31 am, "Android" <androv...@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > A new week, a new exclusive lost.
>
> > > You mean the 360 never even had it as an exclusive? Ouch!
>
> > Good thing the 360 is keeping Lost Planet and Dead Rising as exclusives.
> > Oh, wait...
>
> Yeah, exclusives are going the way of the Dodo bird. But, this hurts
> Sony a *LOT* more than it hurts MS.

No it "hurts" them equally because they both have the game, but
continue lying because you can't stand that the 360 NEVER had these as
exclusives

>
> Sony DEPENDED on its exclusives for the PS2

Almost all of the "exclusives" eventually appeared on the XBox. Again,
nice try.

(and with a HUGE market
> share, they could demand them easily and bully developers around). Now
> Sony finds itself on the same playing field with MS and Nintendo. Must
> be a rude awakening.

If they're on an equal playing field, then how exactly does it hurt
them any more? Please try to stay internally consistent.

>
> Besides, MS has a lot more (and better) first party titles than Sony.
> Sony has NOTHING that compares to a Halo 3.

Hopefully it won't be as disappointing as Halo 2.

>
> If MS were to pick up another huge win like a MGS 4 or a WoW port,
> Sony execs might as well start sharpening their swords for Seppuku.

Yes that makes sense. If the 360 gets another game that's also on the
PS3, that hurts the PS3, but if the PS3 gets another game that's also
on the 360, that doesn't hurt the 360. Are you drunk?

>
> -Eric