George W. Bush: Without Weapons Just A Cheap Politician

> Think about it.

I have.

> He's a liar, a grandstander, and an economic dunce.

Really? And Clinton wasn't?


> His only goal is
> to starve the government of money so to reduce its workings (this
> disguised as a "tax cut").

That is good. If that is the only way to cut the size of government, so be
it.

> He has promoted reckless government
> borrowing, he's a big government spender, he swash buckles around with
> stunts like his carrier landing on the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln and the
> Jessica Lynch facade.

I think you covered most of the economic ranting in your first paragraph. I
don't think you can honestly say that he knew anything about a Jessica Lynch
facade. I know that you can't say that an article in the British equivalent
of the National Enquirer is a valid source for your complaint. As for the
carrier "stunt", I thought it was great that the President of the USA is
able to fly a jet. Didn't he look great as he stepped off of the plane? Of
course it was a "photo op" just as most of the things that occur in politics
are "photo ops". Of course I guess Clinton coming out of a McDonalds isn't
such a great opportunity.


> He's a violent person who has started two wars in 3 years.

Started two wars? I seem to recall that 3,000 Americans died to start these
wars. Have you forgotten that? Are you ready for the certain attacks to
come?

> He has
> most of the world hating the U.S. where they used to revere us.

God damn son, when did the world "revere" us. We have always been hated.
Quite frankly, until I see the rest of the world shaking the Muslim
extremists from their midst I don't give a **** whether they hate us or not.

> And
> he has more wars in mind (North Korea, Iran, Liberia?).

I surely hope so! He needs to get the Iranian and North Korean wars started
pretty quickly. Of course the rest of the world could step in here but we
will be nuked many years before that will occur. It is ignorant asses such
as yourself that don't realize that a good suitcase nuclear bomb in
Manhattan would kill at last half a million American's and virtually destroy
the US economy. Then the people who work for a living( I assume you don't
have a job) will be scrounging for food. Maybe we could take yours but as is
the usual case, you won't have any to take.


> He has
> transferred his economic schizophrenia to be a burden on the next
> generation of Americans and perhaps even their offspring with the
> biggest deficit in history.

What exactly is his "economic schizophrenia"? I don't want a deficit any
more than the next man but right now we need a deficit to cover the wars you
mentioned. Will we always have a deficit? Nope, we can turn at around as
soon as the Democrats quit giving hand outs to people like you.

> Without weapons from the U.S. arsenal he would have been laughed out
> of Washington in a minute.

What are you trying to say here?

> But with the weapons he has gotten the
> right-wing-religious-wacko-senile extremists drooling for more. Even
> the U.S. military has complained about his reckless intentions.

Really? The U.S. military covers a lot of ground and I'm sure that you will
find that some are complaining. Of course those that are complaining are the
ones who joined the services for the money and education. Those that joined
to fight are having a blast. Of course that there are none of these people
in your circle of friends.

As an atheist I don't care one whit for the religious right and wish that
the Republicans could win an election without them. Of course that would be
like saying that the Democrats could win an election without the blacks,
gays, and other left wing extremists especially the trail lawyers.

> Not to mention the intrusion into Americans' privacy with the unneeded
> Patriot Act and the unconstitutional antics of John Ashcroft.

It is a law isn't it? Some of the law may go to extremes but in a climate
such as the one were in, it just might be better to err on the safe side. I
don't care for Ashcraft's self directed forays into privacy but again given
the choice of him or Janet Reno, I'll take Ashcroft.

> But when you think about it he is a lousy president, a derelict
> spender, and has done a great disservice to the people of the United
> States.

Nonsense. I suppose that is why, despite the current economy, his approval
ratings are still in the 60% range. Other than military spending, do you
have any facts on his so-called derelict spending?

> Keep that in mind when you go to vote in 2004.

Don't worry, I am. When the Democrats nominate a liberal whacko as they did
with McGovern or Dukakis they will get swamped again.

> I do have something good to say about Bush. With his public-speaking
> lessons he has really improved his TV presence. This in no way
> qualifies him to be president but at least he can speak coherently now
> as opposed to his incessant babbling and confused talking skills when
> he took office. Good work George Jr.

I still think he is lacking in this area. I think if he could learn to lie
with a straight face, like that great American Bill Clinton, he would do
much better.