On 26 Aug 2003, "Hillbilly Jack" wrote:
>250kb is a bit small, there is a lot of loss in resalution if I
>compress much more. But I will give them a look.
What's "in it for them" if they allowed much bigger files ?
I'd be happy to recommend (off newsgroup) a service at low cost
(US$48/year) that provides 500 MB of webspace and 30 GB of traffic
a month. I was a customer (I now have reseller accounts of my own,
yet cannot compete with those limits at that price
Peter Morgan.